An unstable support surface is not a sufficient condition for increases in muscle activity during rehabilitation exercise.
نویسنده
چکیده
Introduction Resistance training is commonly recognized as an essential component to a rehabilitative treatment plan. Modifications of various exercises are made on the belief that different types of support surfaces and joint positions can influence muscle recruitment levels. One modification to traditional exercises is the addition of an unstable support surface (exercise balls, wobble boards, foam padding) under the assumption that this addition will result in an increase in the neuromuscular activation of the involved muscles. Anecdotally, clinicians and rehabilitation specialists are often heard to state that performing an exercise on an unstable surface causes “the little muscles to work harder to stabilize the joints.” It is a prevalent assumption that the mere addition of unstable surfaces to simple tasks (e.g. sitting on an exercise) ball transforms these simple tasks into exercises which stress the “core” musculature (trunk and pelvis muscles). The exercise biomechanics literature investigating modifications to surface stability has focused on the trunk muscle’s response during resistance exercise. Increases in the amplitude of the EMG signal with the addition of an unstable support surface compared with a stable support surface have been documented during curl up exercises (external oblique),1 trunk bridging exercises (rectus abdominis and external oblique)2–4 and traditional strength training exercises including the squat, shoulder press, dumbbell press (lower abdominal stabilizers, upper and lower erector spinae).5,6 However, not every exercise modified with the addition of an unstable support surface results in a consistent response across participants3 nor in an increase in the trunk muscle’s EMG amplitude.3–6 This lack of an increase has been exemplified in research discounting the common belief and assumption that replacing a chair with an exercise ball results in increases in muscle activation.7 Two studies have disproved this contention demonstrating no difference in trunk muscle activation levels between sitting on a Swiss ball and sitting on a chair.8,9 There has even been evidence of decreases in the amplitude of the abdominal muscles during trunk extension resistance exercises when performed on a stability ball compared with floor.10 The lack of increase in muscle activation levels and inconsistent responses across participants during certain exercises and amongst specific muscles with the addition of unstable surfaces suggest other factors (weight lifted, speed of movement, participant personal characteristics) may influence muscle recruitment to a greater extent than surface instability. What is lost in the conclusions of the preceding research investigating support surface instability is the large variability in the inter-individual responses to these exercises. While the mean activity levels for specific exercises from some studies may suggest that the unstable support surface increases muscle activation levels there are often individuals who do not respond in this manner. The same can be seen when there is no change in the group mean activation level between surface conditions (stable versus labile) yet a specific individual may be greatly affected by changes in surface stability. Thus, individual factors may play a large role in how muscle activation levels are affected by the addition of an unstable surface. The intention of this proof of principle commentary is to illustrate through individual case studies, contrasted with a population mean, examples where muscle
منابع مشابه
Comparing the Electromyography Activity of Core Muscles During Side Plank Exercise on Stable and Unstable Surfaces
Objective Numerous abdominal exercises with Swiss ball are used to improve core stability with strengthening and rehabilitation goals. It is claimed that the stability exercises have a greater impact on core muscle activation, but the validity of this claim is still in doubt. Moreover, there is no comprehensive study on the comparison of the core muscles activity in different core stability exe...
متن کاملSurface EMG during the Push-up plus Exercise on a Stable Support or Swiss Ball: Scapular Stabilizer Muscle Exercise
[Purpose] Scapular stabilizer strengthening exercise is crucial for shoulder rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to compare two types of push-up plus exercises, on a stable and unstable bases of support, using surface electromyography (EMG), to suggest an effective shoulder rehabilitation program. [Subjects and Methods] Ten healthy men volunteered for this study. All volunteers perfor...
متن کاملIs Abdominal Muscle Activity Different from Lumbar Muscle Activity during Four-Point Kneeling?
Background: Stabilization exercises can improve the performance of trunk and back muscles, which are effective in the prevention and treatment of low back pain. The four-point kneeling exercise is one of the most common types of stabilization exercises. This quasi-experimental study aimed to evaluate and compare the level of activation between abdominal and lumbar muscles in the different stage...
متن کاملShoulder muscle EMG activity during push up variations on and off a Swiss ball
BACKGROUND Surface instability is a common addition to traditional rehabilitation and strength exercises with the aim of increasing muscle activity, increasing exercise difficulty and improving joint proprioception. The aim of the current study was to determine if performing upper body closed kinetic chain exercises on a labile surface (Swiss ball) influences myoelectric amplitude when compared...
متن کاملEMG activity of the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during the different phases of the push-up plus exercise on different support surfaces and different hand positions
[Purpose] The appropriate exercise prescription is crucial for achieving scapular stability and providing successful rehabilitation, and the Push-up Plus (PuP) exercise has an important role in shoulder rehabilitation. Consequently, this study examined the effect of support surface stability, hand positioning, and phase of exercise, on the trapezius and serratus anterior muscle contractions as ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
دوره 51 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007